Sheaves and presheaves

Sheaves and presheaves are important structures at the intersection of logic and geometry. Presheaves fit into categorical logic as a relatively inexpressive logic, less expressive than algebraic theories, yet they still encompass many important examples. Presheaves are equivalent to discrete fibrations.



  • Tennison, 1975: Sheaf theory [doi]
  • Reyes, Reyes, Zolfaghari, 2004: Generic figures and their glueings: A constructive approach to functor categories [online , pdf]
  • Borceux, 1994: Handbook of categorical algebra, Vol 3: Categories of sheaves
  • Mac Lane & Moerdijk, 1992: Sheaves in geometry and logic: A first introduction to topos theory [doi, nLab ]

Relational presheaves, the relational counterpart of presheaves

A lax functor \(B \to \mathbf{Rel}\) is variously known as a relational presheaf, relational variable set, specification structure, or dynamic set. Likewise, a lax functor \(B \to \mathbf{Par}\) is a partial presheaf or partial variable set.

  • Rosenthal, 1996: The Theory of Quantaloids, Sec. 3.3: Categories enriched in a free quantaloid
  • Abramsky, Gay, Nagarajan, 1996: Specification structures and propositions-as-types for concurrency [doi]
  • Ghilardi and Meloni, 1996: Relational and partial variable sets and basic predicate logic [doi, jstor ]
  • Niefield, 2004: Change of base for relational variable sets [pdf]
    • Theorem 3.1: Equivalence between relational variable sets and full subcategory \(\mathbf{Cat}_f/B\) of \(\mathbf{Cat}/B\) consisting of faithful functors over \(B\)
  • Niefield, 2010: Lax presheaves and exponentiability [pdf]
    • Studies lax presheaves valued in \(\mathbf{Rel}\), \(\mathbf{Par}\), and \(\mathbf{Span}\)
    • Sec. 3: Further equivalences between lax functors and subcategories of \(\mathbf{Cat}/B\)
  • Sobociński, 2015: Relational presheaves, change of base and weak simulation [doi, pdf]
    • Conference version: Sobociński, 2012: Relational presheaves as labelled transition systems [doi, pdf, slides]

Displayed categories

Closely related to a relational presheaf, a displayed category is a lax functor \(B \to \mathbf{Span}\). Displayed categories over \(B\) are equivalent to slice categories over \(B\):

\[ \mathrm{Lax}(B,\mathbf{Span}) \simeq \mathbf{Cat}/B. \]


Presheaf toposes

Every category of presheaves is an elementary topos, known as a presheaf topos. Much of the literature on topos theory is related sheaves and presheaves.


The category of graphs is an important example of a "combinatorial" presheaf topos.

  • Lawvere, 1989: Qualitative distinctions between some toposes of generalized graphs [pdf]
  • Vigna, 2003: A guided tour of the topos of graphs [arxiv, pdf]
    • Sebastiano Vigna's personal page on graph fibrations
    • Boldi & Vigna, 2002: Fibrations of graphs [doi, pdf]
    • Boldi, Lonati, Santini, Vigna, 2006: Graph fibrations, graph isomorphism, and PageRank [doi, pdf]
  • Ronnie Brown's papers on graphs of graph morphisms, which explicitly invoke the topos of graphs

Not only do graphs form a category of presheaves; there are also sheaves on graphs.

  • Hansen, 2019: A gentle introduction to sheaves on graphs [pdf]
    • A very nice introduction, both readable and rigorous
    • Covers sheaves of vector spaces on graphs, their morphisms and Laplacians, and hints at possible applications
  • Hansen & Ghrist, 2018: Towards a spectral theory of cellular sheaves [arxiv, pdf]
    • A more detailed version of Hansen's "gentle introduction"
    • See also: Hansen & Ghrist, 2019: Learning sheaf Laplacians from smooth signals [doi, pdf]
  • Friedman, 2015: Sheaves on graphs, their homological invariants, and a proof of the Hanna Neumann conjecture [doi, arxiv]

Simplicial and cubical sets

Simplicial sets and semi-simplicial sets form presheaf toposes, generalizing (reflexive) graphs to dimension greater than one. Likewise for cubical sets. For references, see simplicial stuff and cubical stuff.


Presheaves as models of networks

  • Spivak, 2009: Higher-dimensional models of networks [arxiv]
    • Network models as categories of presheaves, with functorial changes of model
    • Main examples: graphs, hypergraphs, semi-simplicial sets, simplicial sets

Sheaves in topological data analysis

  • Robinson, 2014: Topological signal processing [doi]
  • Curry, 2014, PhD thesis: Sheaves, cosheaves and applications [arxiv]
    • Thesis by student of Robert Ghrist developing "cellular sheaves"
    • Sec 4.2, relating classical and cellular sheaves, presents an alternate proof of: Ladkani, 2008: On derived equivalences of categories of sheaves over finite posets [doi, arxiv]
  • Curry, 2018: Dualities between cellular sheaves and cosheaves [doi, arxiv]
    • Partly extracted from Curry's thesis
    • Correction issued in: Curry, 2019: Functors on posets left Kan extend to cosheaves: An erratum [arxiv]
  • Vepstas, 2017: Sheaves: A topological approach to big data [doi, arxiv, GitHub ]
    • A gentle, informal introduction to graphs and cellular sheaves, motivated by data analysis
    • Plenty of good intuition but certain analogies make little sense to me (e.g., comparing graphs and lambda calculus as "similar concepts")
    • Also lots of mistakes, not merely typographical (assuming an adjacency list representation when claiming that graphs have bad computational properties compared to sections; claiming that contractions are what make tensor algebras into a monoidal category, rather than a compact closed category; claiming that "simply typed" means there is only one type; and so on)

Sheaves in systems theory

  • Goguen, 1992: Sheaf semantics for concurrent interacting objects [doi]
    • Brief exposition in Spivak, 2014: Category Theory for the Sciences, Sec. 7.2.3: Sheaves, especially Sec Time
  • Robinson, 2017: Sheaves are the canonical datastructure for sensor integration [doi, arxiv]
    • Robinson, 2017: Sheaf and duality methods for analyzing multi-model systems [doi, arxiv]
    • Purvine, Joslyn, Robinson, 2016: A category theoretical investigation of the type hierarchy for heterogeneous sensor integration [arxiv]
  • Schultz & Spivak, 2019: Temporal type theory: A topos-theoretic approach to systems and behavior [doi, arxiv]
    • Spivak, Vasilakopoulou, Schultz, 2016: Dynamical systems and sheaves [arxiv]
    • Speranzon, Spivak, Varadarajan, 2018: Abstraction, composition and contracts: A sheaf theoretic approach [arxiv]